Home Explosion Case: Monserrate Shirley, Mark And Bob Leonard Due In Indianapolis Court

Get Crime Alerts:Sign Up Follow: Bob Leonard, Mark Leonard, Monserrate Shirley, Monserrate Shirley Home Explosion, Blew Up Home For Insurance, Home Blast Kills 2, Indianapolis Crime, Indianapolis Home Explosion, Insurance Payout,Crime News #news_entries #ad_sharebox_260x60 img

View the Original article

Gay Conversion Therapy Ban Blocked By California Court

Get Gay Voices Alerts:Sign Up React:Amazing
Inspiring
Funny
Scary
Hot
Crazy
Important
Weird
Follow:  Jerry Brown,  Gay Rights,  Video, 9th Circuit Court Of Appeals, Conversion Therapy, Gay Conversion Therapy Ban, Gay Conversion Therapy Law, Gay Therapy, Gay Therapy Ban, Gay Therapy Law, Jerry Brown Conversion Therapy,Gay Voices News #news_entries #ad_sharebox_260x60 img

View the Original article

Medical marijuana dispensaries ask court to keep them in business

Font ResizeCops and CourtsLongmont Times-Calldenverpost.comPosted: 12/15/2012 02:52:18 PM MSTDecember 15, 2012 10:10 PM GMTUpdated: 12/15/2012 03:10:58 PM MST

Dacono's three medical marijuana dispensaries are suing to stay open.

On Friday, a lawyer for Dacono Meds, MaryJane's Medicinal and Green Medicals (formerly The Green Door) asked the Weld County District Court to block the city's ban of marijuana-related businesses. Without legal protection, all three will have to leave town after Dec. 31.

The Dacono City Council passed the ban in June by a 4-2 vote, but a petition drive by the dispensaries put the ban on the ballot. That means Dacono residents will vote in 2013 on whether the ban lives or dies. But the petition couldn't change the dispensaries' deadline, and an attempt to extend the drop-dead date until after the special election failed on a 4-3 City Council vote.

http://www.timescall.com/news/longmont-local-news/ci_22196455/dacono-dispensaries-ask-court-block-medical-marijuana-ban

View the Original article

Supreme Court Gay marriage cases Spark hope, fear

The U.s. Supreme Court building is draped in a photorealistic sheet during a repair and conservation project on 7 December 2012 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images) Politics Alerts: sign up get react: important
Funny
Typical
Eng
Scandalous
Amazing
Innovative
Finally,
Follow: Supreme Court, abortion, Gay Marriage, Gay Marriage, Proposition 8, Roe v. Wade, Video, Same-Sex Unions, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, same-sex marriage Gay Marriage politics news # news_entries # ad_sharebox_260x60 img

View the Original article

Edie Windsor responds to Supreme Court to agree with her case DOMA

Gay votes alerts: Sign Up get react: Amazing
Inspirational
Funny
Eng
Hot
Crazy
Important
Weird
Follow: Supreme Court, Gay Marriage, Gay Marriage, DOMA Supreme Court, Defense Of Marriage Act, Defense Of Marriage Act Edie Windsor Windsor Windsor, Edith, Edie, Edie SCOTUS Windsor, SCOTUS, SCOTUS, Supreme Court gay marriage Gay Marriage hearing DOMA case, Doma, Edie Windsor Doma, DOMA, Gay marriage equality, Supreme Court votes news # news_entries # ad_sharebox_260x60 img

View the Original article

GMR: Now Singapore court rules in favour of Maldives

View the Original article

Court ruling lacks clarity on GMR-Maldives concession pact

View the Original article

GMR rubbishes transfer, says Maldivian govt must comply with Court

technically the transfer would be done sometime today. But GMR rubbished these claims, not to say that it has agreed to a transfer. "We expect them to abide by the Court ruling".

View the Original article

Securities appellate court rejects appeal against Sahara Sebi

The Supreme Court had asked these companies to provide documents relating to these investors to Sebi within 10 days. AFP

Passing the order on the appeal filed on 27 November, SAT noted that "a contempt petition by the respondent Board (Securities and Exchange Board of India) and an assessment petition by applicants (Sahara group of companies) against the order dated 31 August 2012 are already in treatment for Supreme Court."

The apex court had asked Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Ltd (SIRECL) and Sahara housing investment Corporation Ltd (SHICL) to an estimated Rs 24,000 crore with an annual interest rate of 15 percent, while Sebi was aimed at facilitating the refund of this money to three refund crore bondholders of the two companies.

The Supreme Court had asked these companies to deliver the documents relating to these investors to Sebi within 10 days and refund the money within three months, failing which the regulator was asked to freeze the accounts and properties of the two companies.

SEBI issued a letter to the two companies asking them to provide data on 1 November 2012 of all bank accounts and properties, if they "don't deliver the documents to the Board within the prescribed time and thus the direction of the Supreme Court violated".

In the appeal at SAT, the Sahara companies said that Sebi "has deliberately refused the documents/information and wrongly went on the basis that the appellants in the non-observance of the instructions in the aforementioned ruling of the Supreme Court".

The two companies pleaded for SAT that they also a petition before the Supreme Court seeking reconsideration of 31 August. They further said the enterprises "are observing that the Board of Directors may not dwell on the payments that can be entered in accordance with the orders of Supreme Court as the Governing Council has randomly denied the documents/information relating to the investors of any fully convertible bonds (OFCD) by the appellants.

"It is, therefore, prayed that this Tribunal the court clerk, sat directly to accept custody can the amount payable by the appellants to the respondent by 30 November is the total amount redeemed by the appellants to excellent and OFCDs together with the interest on it per the directions of the Supreme Court."

The appeal said that Sebi is redirected to the timeframe within which the defendant the amount to the holders of OFCD and repay a scheme will on how the regulator proposes to give the money back.

SEBI counsel, however, objected to the appeal and the Tribunal to hear that the letter issued by the regulatory authority to the two companies not "a judicial order" under Sebi Act was. He submitted further that the appeal is premature, as no amount has contributed by the two companies in accordance with the instructions of the Supreme Court.

PTI

. pagination_article

View the Original article